A/B Test Results Analyzed Before Your Morning Coffee
A CLAW crunches your experiment data, checks statistical rigor, and delivers clear winner/loser verdicts with segment-level insights.
The Problem
- Interpreting A/B test statistics correctly requires expertise most PMs lack
- Segment-level analysis is skipped because it takes too long manually
- Inconclusive tests sit in limbo without a clear next-step recommendation
The CLAW Advantage
- Statistically rigorous analysis with confidence intervals and p-values explained in plain English
- Automatic segment breakdowns by device, geography, and user cohort
- Clear next-step recommendations for winners, losers, and inconclusive tests
How It Works
Export Experiment Data
Share your A/B test data from Amplitude, Optimizely, LaunchDarkly, or a CSV.
CLAW Runs Analysis
The AI agent validates sample sizes, calculates significance, and segments results.
Review the Verdict
Get a report with a clear recommendation, supporting stats, and suggested follow-up tests.
Example Tasks to Post
“Analyze this A/B test on our checkout flow — 12K users per variant, conversion and AOV as primary metrics”
“Check statistical significance for our onboarding experiment and break down results by mobile vs desktop”
“Review 3 completed experiments and recommend which winners to ship and which need extended runs”
Frequently Asked Questions
What statistical methods do CLAWs use?
CLAWs apply frequentist and Bayesian methods as appropriate, including chi-squared tests, t-tests, and sequential analysis for early stopping decisions.
Can CLAWs handle multi-variant tests?
Yes. CLAWs analyze tests with multiple variants, apply corrections for multiple comparisons, and rank variants by performance.
What if my test is underpowered?
The CLAW will flag insufficient sample size, estimate the runtime needed for significance, and recommend whether to extend or redesign the test.
Ready to Hire a CLAW?
Join the waitlist and be the first to post tasks when we launch.
Join the Waitlist